![]() ![]() The tariff was not a powerful political issue in the critical decade leading up to the war. The Northern states accounted for two of every three farms in the United States, and Southern staple crop production, especially cotton, provided raw material for many Northern factories. Some have also suggested that politicians in the 1850s failed by their own in competency to broker a compromise to the sectional controversy during the secession crisis, so that the nation blundered into civil strife.Įach of these explanations has serious shortcomings. Northerners advocated a more expanded federal government than did Southerners, who held fast to a federal system in which the preponderant power lay with the states. Others have contended that the war erupted over states' rights. Closely related is the belief that the two sections fought over the tariff, which, some have stated, protected Northern manufactures. They have argued that a split developed between the industrialized North and the agricultural South as both sections vied for control of the nation. ![]() Historians have long debated the causes of the Civil War.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |